DVD Review Oldboy (2013)

-
Why even call it 'Oldboy?'

A man named Joe (Josh Brolin) is locked away in a motel room for 20 years. He has no idea why. While he's in this isolation, he finds out he has been framed for his wife's murder, and his 3 year old daughter has been raised by foster parents. He decides to kick his alcohol habit, get into shape, and escape. He doesn't get the chance to do that last thing, because one day he wakes up in a suitcase in the middle of a field. He's got some cash and a cell phone on him. As he wonders around, he runs into Marie (Elizabeth Olsen) a woman that works for a clinic that offers to help him. Together with his old friend, Chucky (Michael Imperioli) they try to figure out what happened. Eventually the person who did this (Sharlto Copley) reveals himself, but he's not finished with Joe yet.

Spike Lee's version feels like he watched the original and said "I can 1 up that." There's more blood, more torture, hell even the stranger's reason for doing this tried to push the envelope a little further. The problem is, in doing all of this, he really lost the point of the entire story. Joe is an asshole. We're introduced to him acting like a total douche nozzle to everyone he runs into. Why the fuck should I care why he gets imprisoned? Dae-Su (the man in the original) wasn't shown in this light. Yes, he was shown as an alcoholic, but we never saw him being unkind to anyone. That made me sympathize with him.

The original Oldboy, despite having its grisly moments wasn't nearly as gory as this version, and it worked better. The infamous single take hammer scene is ruined by coming off as overly cartoonish (and not filmed in a single take) and worst of all, both Brolin and Copley over-act  throughout the entire film. Elizabeth Olsen was the only saving grace, but I mostly felt bad for her getting stuck in this film. There's also a major part of her story that is left out in this version* and frankly, it makes her story kind of unbelievable. 

I can appreciate the subtle nods to the original that Lee through in there. The angel wings, the octopus, but that's about all I can appreciate.

Recommended: No

Grade: D

Memorable Quote: "It's time to feed our pets!" - Chaney (Samuel L. Jackson)


*hypnosis. Not hypnotizing Marie seems like a huge risk, doesn't it? How could Adrian be absolutely sure she would do what he desired just by "raising" her to be who she was?

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 27, 2014 at 8:04 AM

    Nice review! This just doesn't need to exist! The original is great, I'll be sticking to that :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. s.March 27, 2014 at 9:31 AM

    I'm probably gonna see it for Olsen but I'm sure I'm gonna regret doing that :/

    ReplyDelete
  3. m.brownMarch 27, 2014 at 1:07 PM

    Some guy I work with swears by this movie, but he had never heard of the original (red flag, anyone?). Oh, and he has it on 'bootleg' too, which I refuse to watch.

    I'm with Sati in that I'll check this out for Olsen...but this whole idea never really sat well with me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brittani BurnhamMarch 28, 2014 at 8:42 AM

      Someone swears by this over the original? Da fuk?

      It's not even about being an original snob here, the protagonist in the original is actually sympathetic. This one, I couldn't care less what happens to him.

      Delete
  4. Dan O.March 27, 2014 at 11:09 PM

    Good review Brittani. Maybe unnecessary, but still a bit better than I expected it to be. However, I will always prefer the original to this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brittani BurnhamMarch 28, 2014 at 8:42 AM

      Yes, the protagonist in the original is always going to be better. Actually, the whole movie.

      Delete
  5. MyerlaMarch 30, 2014 at 4:54 PM

    I probably going to see this, because of Lizze Olsen mainly, absolutely love her (in a non creepy way) - glad to see that she is the film's saving grace.

    I love the original (that twist is twisted and I LOVE it), so this has a lot of work to do outdo the original (which seems unlikely).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brittani BurnhamMarch 30, 2014 at 7:40 PM

      They ruin the big twist in this movie, IMO. It's like they tried too hard.

      Delete
  6. JoshApril 16, 2014 at 7:14 PM

    I keep reading negative reviews, but I'll probably check it out for Lee and the cast at some point. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brittani BurnhamApril 16, 2014 at 8:22 PM

      It's so awful. I mean, if you've seen the original, it's probably good to compare..

      Delete

Post a Comment

Thanks for stopping by, let's talk movies!
(comments are moderated to reduce spam)

Popular posts from this blog

Random Ramblings: The Radio Flyer Conundrum

-
Image
Recently, I was talking to someone about who I thought were the best child actors when I was also a child.  Two that really stood out to me were Elijah Wood and Joseph Mazello, and one film those two were in together was called Radio Flyer.  Then I was reminded about the uniqueness of this film. Instead of reviewing the film, I wanted to have an open discussion about the ending. It deals with a tough issue; child abuse. What I’ve noticed is the way that the film ends is interpreted many different ways, and the filmmakers never came forward to say what was right and wrong. I’m interested in hearing everyone’s opinions on it. How did you interpret the ending? Obviously spoiler alerts will follow.. For those of you who haven’t seen the film, the basic premise is this: Two young boys, Mikey (Wood) and Bobby (Mazello) move in with their single mother and her boyfriend, who refers to himself as ‘The King’. It doesn’t take long for The King to start physically abusing Bobby, and the
Read more

Indie Gems: Behind The Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon

-
Image
Passionate about your profession? I had never heard of this film until it ended up on one of Jason's favorite horror movie lists around Halloween. It immediately sounded interesting to me, so of course I threw it in my Netflix queue. (and if I'm just now watching it after adding it around Halloween, you know how ridiculous my queue is) Taylor (Angela Goethals) is a journalist who, along with a film crew decides to follow around a serial killer named Leslie Vernon. (Nathan Baesel) He plans on doing the typical slasher thing - getting a bunch of drunk teens in an abandoned house and knocking them off one by one. He gets advice from a retired serial killer, Eugene (Scott Wilson) and is threatened by a man who's on to him, Doc Holloran (Robert Englund) Taylor and crew are there capturing it all. Leslie Vernon is fucking hilarious to start with, and clearly very passionate about what he does. He tells Taylor all of his secrets and can barely contain his excitemen
Read more

Please join me in my Favorite Movie Titles Blogathon!

-
Image
Earlier this week I made a post where I ran through the letters of the alphabet with my favorite movie titles. There were a few people that suggested I turn it into a blogathon, and I've never done that before. So here goes nothing! Since this is my first attempt at a blogathon, it's all pretty simple, and it's hopefully a quick post that everyone can join in. Rules: 1) Going through the alphabet, list your favorite movie title beginning with each letter.  2) You don't have to necessarily  like the movie to use it's title.  3) Use the banner at the top of this post in yours. 4) Please have submissions in by Friday, May 30th*. (But I'll be honest, if you send them to me after that date, I'll still add them to my post.) You can either leave a link to your post in the comments here or tweet it to me, ( @ramblingfilm )  Thanks everyone! :)  *I had to move the date back a week due to Photobucket threatening me with bandwidth issues. But
Read more