Review: Shirley

What happens to all lost girls?



A young couple, Rose (Odessa Young) and Fred (Logan Lerman) are temporarily living with Fred's mentor/professor Stanley (Michael Stuhlbarg) and his reclusive wife, author Shirley Jackson. (Elisabeth Moss) Rose is a fan of her work, but Shirley is agoraphobic and isn't happy with her new guests. Her stance towards Rose changes when she becomes obsessed with a missing girl's story while working on her newest novel. 

This is very highly praised on Film Twitter. I expected my biggest struggle was going to be whether or not I can ignore Elisabeth Moss's Scientology background (why is such a good actress in such an awful cult?) but as fate would have it, I'd struggle with all of this.

I'll give this film credit where its due, it's definitely not like a traditional biopic. You don't necessarily learn a lot about Jackson and it's certainly not filmed like one, which gives it the edge of not being more of the same. I didn't care for director Josephine Decker's last feature Madeline's Madeline. Which I still to this day do not understand. This one narratively is easier to follow but its whimsical, claustrophobic approach wasn't that much better for me personally.

While Moss is good, I think it's Odessa Young who is the true standout here. Rose puts up with so much during the course of this film. Her husband sucks. Stanley is a creep, Shirley is passive aggressive. This is more her story than Jackson's.

I hate being *that* person who hates a film everyone else loves, but just did not work for me. It's convoluted and I'm so sick of the shooting style of having the camera constantly inches away from the actor's faces. I know it's a personal preference but I find it more distracting than effective.

Recommended: No

Grade: C-

Memorable Quote: "I read your story, it made me feel thrillingly horrible." - Rose (Odessa Young)

Comments

  1. I heard good things about this film although I'm not sure if I want to see it though I too am a fan of Elisabeth Moss despite her affiliation with Scientology though let's be glad she's not some insane aging midget.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel like everyone liked this movie more than I did. I was just so disappointed.

      Delete
  2. I think I liked it a little bit more than you did but I can see why this wouldn't be for everyone. To be honest I had a hard time getting in sync with it at times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a good way to describe it, I just wanted it to work and it didn't.

      Delete
  3. Nice review! I saw the trailer for this before Portrait of a Lady on Fire and it looked interesting - but I'm not in a rush. It looked a little convoluted, which is a shame.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm realizing I'm not a fan of the structure in which she shoots her films.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Thanks for stopping by, let's talk movies!
(comments are moderated to reduce spam)

Popular posts from this blog

Random Ramblings: The Radio Flyer Conundrum

Indie Gems: Behind The Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon

Please join me in my Favorite Movie Titles Blogathon!